By way of introduction, we wish to discuss a cautionary tale
of how well-meaning intentions and an incorrect hypothesis
can become interwoven into the fabric of ethical standards
in forensic investigations. This tale does not imply that ethical standards
were or have been compromised because such standards
are moot with respect to the tale. We wish to use the tale to simply
delineate facts from conjectures and show what science and engineering
can prove or disprove. It also indicates that some facts
cannot be conclusively proven at all times and in all instances.
Rather, it is an example of how intense assertions or misguided or
unproven beliefs can cloud judgment leading to incorrect beliefs
or conclusions. In a strict sense, what we wish to describe is not
a forensic engineering ethical failure, although it involves forensic
engineering. The story involves documented events, witness statements,
physical evidence, conjectures, unproven claims, and some
sophisticated engineering conducted by the leading laboratory in
explosions in the United States. Hopefully, this account will help
set the stage for the theme of the book relative to the adherence to
ethical standards.